The verdict
Tyson Frizell has the edge
Across 16 rate and efficiency measures, Tyson Frizell leads by 63%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonEddie Ieremia-Toeava63%of decided measures13measures wonTyson Frizell
Games played: 17 for Eddie Ieremia-Toeava, 21 for Tyson Frizell. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Eddie Ieremia-Toeava |  Tyson Frizell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.06 | 0.10Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.24Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.24Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.18Better | 0.05 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.41 | 0.81Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.4 | 11.2Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.1 | 2.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 62.3 | 80.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 62.3 | 81.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 22.5 | 31.1Better |
| Runs per Game | 7.0 | 8.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.90 | 9.04Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.48 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 18.9 | 24.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.2 | 93.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Games played | 17 | 21 |