The verdict
Jermaine McEwen has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Jermaine McEwen leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonEddie Ieremia-Toeava16%of decided measures11measures wonJermaine McEwen
Games played: 17 for Eddie Ieremia-Toeava, 20 for Jermaine McEwen. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Eddie Ieremia-Toeava |  Jermaine McEwen |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.06 | 0.10Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.24Better | 0.15 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.24Better | 0.10 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.18 | 0.30Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.76 | 1.75Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.41Better | 0.20 |
| Possessions per Game | 8.4 | 14.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.1 | 2.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 62.3 | 94.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 62.3 | 97.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 22.5 | 33.9Better |
| Runs per Game | 7.0 | 11.6Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.90Better | 8.18 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.48Better | 8.30 |
| Tackles per Game | 18.9 | 33.8Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.2Better | 89.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05Better | 0.09 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.05 |
| Games played | 17 | 20 |