2026 NRL player comparison

Eddie Ieremia-ToeavavsFrancis Manuleleua

Warriors · Second Row versus Knights · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Eddie Ieremia-Toeava has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Eddie Ieremia-Toeava leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

10measures wonEddie Ieremia-Toeava5%of decided measures9measures wonFrancis Manuleleua

Games played: 17 for Eddie Ieremia-Toeava, 18 for Francis Manuleleua. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoEddie Ieremia-ToeavaKnights logoFrancis Manuleleua
Tries per Game0.060.11Better
Try Assists per Game0.240.33Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.24Better0.17
Points per Game0.20.4Better
Line Breaks per Game0.180.44Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.761.11Better
Offloads per Game0.410.44Better
Possessions per Game8.4Better5.2
Passes per Game1.1Better0.9
Run Metres per Game62.3Better46.2
Metres Gained per Game62.3Better46.2
Post-Contact Metres per Game22.5Better20.3
Runs per Game7.0Better4.5
Metres per Run8.9010.27Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.4810.07Better
Tackles per Game18.9Better13.9
Tackle Efficiency91.2Better84.2
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.05Better0.14
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.01Better
Games played1718