The verdict
Max Plath has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Max Plath leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonDylan Egan16%of decided measures11measures wonMax Plath
Games played: 16 for Dylan Egan, 19 for Max Plath. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Dylan Egan |  Max Plath |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.13 | 0.21Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.06Better | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Points per Game | 0.5 | 0.8Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.13 | 0.37Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.00 | 2.16Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.19Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 12.3 | 56.9Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.3 | 48.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 81.0Better | 79.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 82.7Better | 79.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 30.1 | 30.6Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.4Better | 9.2 |
| Metres per Run | 8.58 | 8.71Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.33 | 9.34Better |
| Tackles per Game | 41.3Better | 33.9 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 92.7Better | 91.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05Better | 0.07 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 16 | 19 |