The verdict
Too close to call
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonDylan Egan0%of decided measures9measures wonJermaine McEwen
Games played: 16 for Dylan Egan, 20 for Jermaine McEwen. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Dylan Egan |  Jermaine McEwen |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.13Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.06 | 0.15Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.10Better |
| Points per Game | 0.5Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.13 | 0.30Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.00Better | 1.75 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.19 | 0.20Better |
| Possessions per Game | 12.3 | 14.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| Run Metres per Game | 81.0 | 94.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 82.7 | 97.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 30.1 | 33.9Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.4 | 11.6Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.58Better | 8.18 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.33Better | 8.30 |
| Tackles per Game | 41.3Better | 33.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 92.7Better | 89.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05Better | 0.09 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.05 |
| Games played | 16 | 20 |