2026 NRL player comparison

Dylan EganvsEddie Ieremia-Toeava

Dragons · Second Row versus Warriors · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Dylan Egan has the edge

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Dylan Egan leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

11measures wonDylan Egan22%of decided measures7measures wonEddie Ieremia-Toeava

Games played: 16 for Dylan Egan, 17 for Eddie Ieremia-Toeava. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricDragons logoDylan EganWarriors logoEddie Ieremia-Toeava
Tries per Game0.13Better0.06
Try Assists per Game0.060.24Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.000.24Better
Points per Game0.5Better0.2
Line Breaks per Game0.130.18Better
Tackle Breaks per Game2.00Better0.76
Offloads per Game0.190.41Better
Possessions per Game12.3Better8.4
Passes per Game2.3Better1.1
Run Metres per Game81.0Better62.3
Metres Gained per Game82.7Better62.3
Post-Contact Metres per Game30.1Better22.5
Runs per Game9.4Better7.0
Metres per Run8.588.90Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.338.48Better
Tackles per Game41.3Better18.9
Tackle Efficiency92.7Better91.2
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.050.05
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.040.02Better
Games played1617