2026 NRL player comparison

Dylan BrownvsLuke Metcalf

Knights · Halfback versus Warriors · Halfback

Compare another player

The verdict

Dylan Brown has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Dylan Brown leads by 68%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

16measures wonDylan Brown68%of decided measures3measures wonLuke Metcalf

Games played: 15 for Dylan Brown, 10 for Luke Metcalf. Compared positions: Halfback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricKnights logoDylan BrownWarriors logoLuke Metcalf
Tries per Game0.130.20Better
Try Assists per Game0.60Better0.10
Line Break Assists per Game0.60Better0.20
Points per Game0.62.0Better
Line Breaks per Game0.27Better0.10
Tackle Breaks per Game1.53Better0.50
Offloads per Game1.07Better0.00
Possessions per Game57.5Better13.5
Passes per Game38.9Better8.8
Run Metres per Game101.9Better19.3
Metres Gained per Game464.4Better113.1
Post-Contact Metres per Game32.4Better4.7
Runs per Game11.7Better2.1
Metres per Run8.699.19Better
Metres per Hit-Up––
Tackles per Game21.1Better5.8
Tackle Efficiency87.3Better86.6
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.08Better0.10
Conversion Accuracy–75.0
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.02
Kicks per Game9.5Better2.8
Kick Metres per Game362.4Better94.0
Games played1510