The verdict
Dean Ieremia has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Dean Ieremia leads by 10%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonDean Ieremia10%of decided measures9measures wonTevita Naufahu
Games played: 5 for Dean Ieremia, 13 for Tevita Naufahu. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Dean Ieremia |  Tevita Naufahu |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.20 | 0.23Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.08Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.8 | 0.9Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.20 | 0.77Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.20 | 3.38Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.00 | 0.08Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.6Better | 13.0 |
| Passes per Game | 1.8 | 1.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 131.8Better | 108.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 131.8Better | 112.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 43.2Better | 34.0 |
| Runs per Game | 15.8Better | 10.9 |
| Metres per Run | 8.34 | 9.96Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.98 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.0Better | 2.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.3Better | 79.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10Better | 0.19 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.2Better | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 23.4Better | 13.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Games played | 5 | 13 |