2026 NRL player comparison

Chris RandallvsNat Butcher

Titans · Lock versus Roosters · Lock

Compare another player

The verdict

Nat Butcher has the edge

Across 16 rate and efficiency measures, Nat Butcher leads by 25%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

6measures wonChris Randall25%of decided measures10measures wonNat Butcher

Games played: 21 for Chris Randall, 22 for Nat Butcher. Compared positions: Lock.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricTitans logoChris RandallRoosters logoNat Butcher
Tries per Game0.050.05
Try Assists per Game0.050.05
Line Break Assists per Game0.10Better0.05
Points per Game0.20.2
Line Breaks per Game0.10Better0.09
Tackle Breaks per Game0.670.73Better
Offloads per Game0.050.27Better
Possessions per Game17.1Better15.1
Passes per Game9.6Better1.3
Run Metres per Game60.1117.9Better
Metres Gained per Game62.0118.3Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game23.642.2Better
Runs per Game7.513.5Better
Metres per Run8.048.70Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.44Better8.14
Tackles per Game30.933.7Better
Tackle Efficiency92.693.9Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.040.02Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.01Better0.02
Games played2122