The verdict
Lindsay Smith has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Lindsay Smith leads by 56%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
4measures wonChris Randall56%of decided measures14measures wonLindsay Smith
Games played: 21 for Chris Randall, 24 for Lindsay Smith. Compared positions: Lock.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Chris Randall |  Lindsay Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.05 | 0.13Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.13Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.25Better |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.5Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10Better | 0.08 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.67 | 1.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.05 | 0.71Better |
| Possessions per Game | 17.1 | 20.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 9.6Better | 9.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 60.1 | 87.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 62.0 | 88.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 23.6 | 29.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 7.5 | 11.2Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.04Better | 7.81 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.44Better | 7.60 |
| Tackles per Game | 30.9 | 34.3Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 92.6 | 94.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.04 | 0.03Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Games played | 21 | 24 |