The verdict
Mark Nawaqanitawase has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Mark Nawaqanitawase leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad33%of decided measures14measures wonMark Nawaqanitawase
Games played: 15 for Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, 19 for Mark Nawaqanitawase. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad |  Mark Nawaqanitawase |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.80Better | 0.79 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.32Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.32Better |
| Points per Game | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.80Better | 0.74 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.67 | 3.21Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.80 | 1.21Better |
| Possessions per Game | 21.7Better | 21.6 |
| Passes per Game | 7.5Better | 2.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 123.1 | 157.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 125.1 | 162.2Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.3 | 60.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.3 | 16.4Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.28 | 9.61Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.24Better | 7.72 |
| Tackles per Game | 9.9Better | 4.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.7 | 84.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15 | 0.14Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.11 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.5 | 3.1Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 25.7 | 34.9Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.6 | 1.3Better |
| Games played | 15 | 19 |