2026 NRL player comparison

Charnze Nicoll-KlokstadvsLuke Laulili'i

Warriors · Wing versus Warriors · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad leads by 91%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

21measures wonCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad91%of decided measures1measures wonLuke Laulili'i

Games played: 15 for Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, 12 for Luke Laulili'i. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoCharnze Nicoll-KlokstadWarriors logoLuke Laulili'i
Tries per Game0.80Better0.50
Try Assists per Game0.20Better0.17
Line Break Assists per Game0.20Better0.08
Points per Game3.2Better2.0
Line Breaks per Game0.80Better0.58
Tackle Breaks per Game2.67Better2.00
Offloads per Game0.80Better0.42
Possessions per Game21.7Better15.1
Passes per Game7.5Better2.0
Run Metres per Game123.1Better109.2
Metres Gained per Game125.1Better110.8
Post-Contact Metres per Game37.3Better33.4
Runs per Game13.3Better12.1
Metres per Run9.28Better9.03
Metres per Hit-Up8.248.26Better
Tackles per Game9.9Better2.8
Tackle Efficiency82.7Better75.6
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.15Better0.29
Conversion Accuracy0.0
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.03Better0.06
Kick Returns per Game2.5Better1.4
Kick Return Metres per Game25.7Better14.0
Bombs Caught per Game0.6Better0.4
Games played1512