The verdict
Lehi Hopoate has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Lehi Hopoate leads by 27%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad27%of decided measures14measures wonLehi Hopoate
Games played: 15 for Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, 23 for Lehi Hopoate. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad |  Lehi Hopoate |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.80 | 0.83Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.17 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.22Better |
| Points per Game | 3.2 | 3.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.80 | 1.00Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.67 | 2.78Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.80Better | 0.74 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.7 | 23.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 7.5Better | 4.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 123.1 | 160.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 125.1 | 162.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.3 | 51.5Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.3 | 16.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.28 | 9.48Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.24Better | 7.98 |
| Tackles per Game | 9.9Better | 6.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.7Better | 70.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15Better | 0.29 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.04 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.5 | 2.7Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 25.7 | 27.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.6 | 0.9Better |
| Games played | 15 | 23 |