The verdict
Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad leads by 73%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
19measures wonCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad73%of decided measures3measures wonFletcher Hunt
Games played: 15 for Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, 24 for Fletcher Hunt. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.80Better | 0.54 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.21Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.25Better |
| Points per Game | 3.2Better | 2.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.80Better | 0.50 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.67Better | 1.88 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.80Better | 0.71 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.7Better | 12.2 |
| Passes per Game | 7.5Better | 3.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 123.1Better | 73.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 125.1Better | 76.5 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.3Better | 18.5 |
| Runs per Game | 13.3Better | 8.1 |
| Metres per Run | 9.28Better | 9.13 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.24Better | 6.41 |
| Tackles per Game | 9.9Better | 8.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.7Better | 78.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15Better | 0.17 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.09 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.5Better | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 25.7Better | 14.9 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.6 | 0.9Better |
| Games played | 15 | 24 |