The verdict
Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad leads by 45%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
16measures wonCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad45%of decided measures6measures wonDean Ieremia
Games played: 15 for Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, 5 for Dean Ieremia. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad |  Dean Ieremia |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.80Better | 0.20 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 3.2Better | 0.8 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.80Better | 0.20 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.67Better | 1.20 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.80Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.7Better | 18.6 |
| Passes per Game | 7.5Better | 1.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 123.1 | 131.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 125.1 | 131.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.3 | 43.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.3 | 15.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.28Better | 8.34 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.24Better | 7.98 |
| Tackles per Game | 9.9Better | 4.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.7 | 83.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15 | 0.10Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.04 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.5Better | 2.2 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 25.7Better | 23.4 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.6Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 15 | 5 |