The verdict
Chanel Harris-Tavita has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Chanel Harris-Tavita leads by 10%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonChanel Harris-Tavita10%of decided measures9measures wonStephen Crichton
Games played: 22 for Chanel Harris-Tavita, 20 for Stephen Crichton. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Chanel Harris-Tavita |  Stephen Crichton |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.36Better | 0.35 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.64Better | 0.45 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.55 | 0.55 |
| Points per Game | 3.5 | 6.7Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.23 | 0.45Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.73 | 1.80Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.36 | 0.95Better |
| Possessions per Game | 41.5Better | 30.5 |
| Passes per Game | 28.0Better | 16.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 41.0 | 89.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 347.5Better | 259.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 9.1 | 33.5Better |
| Runs per Game | 4.5 | 8.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.12 | 10.26Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | 10.85 |
| Tackles per Game | 15.0Better | 13.2 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 80.2Better | 78.7 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.18 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 61.5 | 73.7Better |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.04 |
| Kicks per Game | 8.5Better | 4.8 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 306.5Better | 170.6 |
| Games played | 22 | 20 |