The verdict
Chanel Harris-Tavita has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Chanel Harris-Tavita leads by 79%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonChanel Harris-Tavita79%of decided measures2measures wonLuke Hanson
Games played: 22 for Chanel Harris-Tavita, 7 for Luke Hanson. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Chanel Harris-Tavita | Luke Hanson |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.36Better | 0.14 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.64Better | 0.29 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.55Better | 0.43 |
| Points per Game | 3.5Better | 0.7 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.23Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.73Better | 0.71 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.36Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 41.5Better | 12.6 |
| Passes per Game | 28.0Better | 9.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 41.0Better | 16.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 347.5Better | 35.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 9.1Better | 5.3 |
| Runs per Game | 4.5Better | 2.3 |
| Metres per Run | 9.12Better | 7.19 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 15.0Better | 8.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 80.2 | 86.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13 | 0.03Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 61.5 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Kicks per Game | 8.5Better | 0.7 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 306.5Better | 19.4 |
| Games played | 22 | 7 |