The verdict
Jake Clifford has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jake Clifford leads by 24%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonChanel Harris-Tavita24%of decided measures13measures wonJake Clifford
Games played: 22 for Chanel Harris-Tavita, 24 for Jake Clifford. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.36 | 0.38Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.64Better | 0.58 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.55Better | 0.50 |
| Points per Game | 3.5 | 6.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.23 | 0.46Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.73 | 1.79Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.36 | 0.75Better |
| Possessions per Game | 41.5Better | 36.3 |
| Passes per Game | 28.0Better | 21.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 41.0 | 55.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 347.5 | 403.2Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 9.1 | 18.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 4.5 | 6.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.12Better | 8.41 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | 4.00 |
| Tackles per Game | 15.0 | 15.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 80.2 | 82.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.15 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 61.5 | 65.8Better |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.03 |
| Kicks per Game | 8.5Better | 8.3 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 306.5 | 348.0Better |
| Games played | 22 | 24 |