2026 NRL player comparison

Chanel Harris-TavitavsJake Clifford

Warriors · Five-Eighth versus Cowboys · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Jake Clifford has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jake Clifford leads by 24%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

8measures wonChanel Harris-Tavita24%of decided measures13measures wonJake Clifford

Games played: 22 for Chanel Harris-Tavita, 24 for Jake Clifford. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoChanel Harris-TavitaCowboys logoJake Clifford
Tries per Game0.360.38Better
Try Assists per Game0.64Better0.58
Line Break Assists per Game0.55Better0.50
Points per Game3.56.0Better
Line Breaks per Game0.230.46Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.731.79Better
Offloads per Game0.360.75Better
Possessions per Game41.5Better36.3
Passes per Game28.0Better21.5
Run Metres per Game41.055.0Better
Metres Gained per Game347.5403.2Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game9.118.3Better
Runs per Game4.56.5Better
Metres per Run9.12Better8.41
Metres per Hit-Up4.00
Tackles per Game15.015.2Better
Tackle Efficiency80.282.5Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.13Better0.15
Conversion Accuracy61.565.8Better
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.01Better0.03
Kicks per Game8.5Better8.3
Kick Metres per Game306.5348.0Better
Games played2224