2026 NRL player comparison

Chanel Harris-TavitavsFletcher Sharpe

Warriors · Five-Eighth versus Knights · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Fletcher Sharpe has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Fletcher Sharpe leads by 30%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

7measures wonChanel Harris-Tavita30%of decided measures13measures wonFletcher Sharpe

Games played: 22 for Chanel Harris-Tavita, 22 for Fletcher Sharpe. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoChanel Harris-TavitaKnights logoFletcher Sharpe
Tries per Game0.360.55Better
Try Assists per Game0.64Better0.50
Line Break Assists per Game0.550.73Better
Points per Game3.5Better2.2
Line Breaks per Game0.230.59Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.733.18Better
Offloads per Game0.360.68Better
Possessions per Game41.5Better40.9
Passes per Game28.029.0Better
Run Metres per Game41.0105.6Better
Metres Gained per Game347.5Better140.4
Post-Contact Metres per Game9.135.6Better
Runs per Game4.510.5Better
Metres per Run9.1210.10Better
Metres per Hit-Up7.50
Tackles per Game15.017.5Better
Tackle Efficiency80.286.3Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.130.09Better
Conversion Accuracy61.5
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.01Better0.02
Kicks per Game8.5Better1.3
Kick Metres per Game306.5Better34.8
Games played2222