The verdict
Chanel Harris-Tavita has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Chanel Harris-Tavita leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonChanel Harris-Tavita20%of decided measures8measures wonEzra Mam
Games played: 22 for Chanel Harris-Tavita, 22 for Ezra Mam. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Chanel Harris-Tavita |  Ezra Mam |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.36 | 0.45Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.64Better | 0.55 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.55Better | 0.50 |
| Points per Game | 3.5Better | 1.8 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.23 | 0.64Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.73 | 1.77Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.36Better | 0.27 |
| Possessions per Game | 41.5Better | 31.5 |
| Passes per Game | 28.0Better | 21.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 41.0 | 80.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 347.5Better | 119.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 9.1 | 21.6Better |
| Runs per Game | 4.5 | 8.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.12 | 9.36Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | 11.50 |
| Tackles per Game | 15.0 | 16.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 80.2Better | 74.2 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.29 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 61.5 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.04 |
| Kicks per Game | 8.5Better | 2.0 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 306.5Better | 39.8 |
| Games played | 22 | 22 |