2026 NRL player comparison

Chanel Harris-TavitavsClayton Faulalo

Warriors · Five-Eighth versus Sea Eagles · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Too close to call

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

10measures wonChanel Harris-Tavita0%of decided measures10measures wonClayton Faulalo

Games played: 22 for Chanel Harris-Tavita, 16 for Clayton Faulalo. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoChanel Harris-TavitaSea Eagles logoClayton Faulalo
Tries per Game0.360.50Better
Try Assists per Game0.640.69Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.551.00Better
Points per Game3.5Better2.0
Line Breaks per Game0.230.50Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.732.50Better
Offloads per Game0.360.38Better
Possessions per Game41.5Better20.3
Passes per Game28.0Better8.5
Run Metres per Game41.0106.0Better
Metres Gained per Game347.5Better121.2
Post-Contact Metres per Game9.140.5Better
Runs per Game4.510.8Better
Metres per Run9.129.86Better
Metres per Hit-Up–8.25
Tackles per Game15.0Better7.3
Tackle Efficiency80.2Better75.3
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.13Better0.28
Conversion Accuracy61.5–
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0–
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.01Better0.02
Kicks per Game8.5Better0.5
Kick Metres per Game306.5Better15.1
Games played2216