The verdict
Matt Burton has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Matt Burton leads by 10%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonCasey McLean10%of decided measures11measures wonMatt Burton
Games played: 18 for Casey McLean, 23 for Matt Burton. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Casey McLean |  Matt Burton |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.61Better | 0.39 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.56Better | 0.35 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.83Better | 0.61 |
| Points per Game | 2.4 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.67Better | 0.57 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.89 | 2.96Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.56 | 0.61Better |
| Possessions per Game | 19.3 | 36.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 4.2 | 19.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 132.2Better | 122.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 135.7 | 310.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.7Better | 42.3 |
| Runs per Game | 14.3Better | 13.0 |
| Metres per Run | 9.22 | 9.44Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.70Better | 7.44 |
| Tackles per Game | 14.8 | 16.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 77.6 | 81.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.24 | 0.15Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 79.2 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.02Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 18 | 23 |