2026 NRL player comparison

Campbell GrahamvsCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad

Rabbitohs · Wing versus Warriors · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

9measures wonCampbell Graham18%of decided measures13measures wonCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad

Games played: 18 for Campbell Graham, 15 for Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRabbitohs logoCampbell GrahamWarriors logoCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad
Tries per Game0.720.80Better
Try Assists per Game0.060.20Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.170.20Better
Points per Game2.93.2Better
Line Breaks per Game0.83Better0.80
Tackle Breaks per Game3.56Better2.67
Offloads per Game0.560.80Better
Possessions per Game19.621.7Better
Passes per Game3.07.5Better
Run Metres per Game144.3Better123.1
Metres Gained per Game144.4Better125.1
Post-Contact Metres per Game48.9Better37.3
Runs per Game15.4Better13.3
Metres per Run9.35Better9.28
Metres per Hit-Up8.008.24Better
Tackles per Game7.89.9Better
Tackle Efficiency83.9Better82.7
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.11Better0.15
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.060.03Better
Kick Returns per Game1.62.5Better
Kick Return Metres per Game13.925.7Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.40.6Better
Games played1815