2026 NRL player comparison

Cameron MunstervsChanel Harris-Tavita

Storm · Five-Eighth versus Warriors · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Cameron Munster has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Cameron Munster leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

12measures wonCameron Munster20%of decided measures8measures wonChanel Harris-Tavita

Games played: 19 for Cameron Munster, 22 for Chanel Harris-Tavita. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricStorm logoCameron MunsterWarriors logoChanel Harris-Tavita
Tries per Game0.210.36Better
Try Assists per Game0.580.64Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.530.55Better
Points per Game0.93.5Better
Line Breaks per Game0.26Better0.23
Tackle Breaks per Game1.89Better0.73
Offloads per Game1.68Better0.36
Possessions per Game50.4Better41.5
Passes per Game36.1Better28.0
Run Metres per Game77.7Better41.0
Metres Gained per Game234.9347.5Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game22.4Better9.1
Runs per Game10.3Better4.5
Metres per Run7.549.12Better
Metres per Hit-Up10.00–
Tackles per Game25.8Better15.0
Tackle Efficiency85.7Better80.2
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.12Better0.13
Conversion Accuracy100.0Better61.5
Penalty Goal Accuracy–100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.010.01
Kicks per Game5.38.5Better
Kick Metres per Game157.2306.5Better
Games played1922