2026 NRL player comparison

Cameron McInnesvsVictor Radley

Sharks · Lock versus Roosters · Lock

Compare another player

The verdict

Cameron McInnes has the edge

Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Cameron McInnes leads by 6%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

9measures wonCameron McInnes6%of decided measures8measures wonVictor Radley

Games played: 17 for Cameron McInnes, 16 for Victor Radley. Compared positions: Lock.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoCameron McInnesRoosters logoVictor Radley
Tries per Game0.060.06
Try Assists per Game0.000.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.18Better0.13
Points per Game0.20.3Better
Line Breaks per Game0.12Better0.00
Tackle Breaks per Game1.12Better0.75
Offloads per Game0.12Better0.06
Possessions per Game17.920.3Better
Passes per Game8.111.0Better
Run Metres per Game75.978.2Better
Metres Gained per Game75.980.1Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game26.227.4Better
Runs per Game10.1Better9.8
Metres per Run7.558.02Better
Metres per Hit-Up7.868.35Better
Tackles per Game32.2Better31.8
Tackle Efficiency94.0Better87.9
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.04Better0.07
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.02Better0.03
Games played1716