The verdict
Cameron McInnes has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Cameron McInnes leads by 6%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonCameron McInnes6%of decided measures8measures wonVictor Radley
Games played: 17 for Cameron McInnes, 16 for Victor Radley. Compared positions: Lock.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.18Better | 0.13 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.12Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.12Better | 0.75 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.12Better | 0.06 |
| Possessions per Game | 17.9 | 20.3Better |
| Passes per Game | 8.1 | 11.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 75.9 | 78.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 75.9 | 80.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 26.2 | 27.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 10.1Better | 9.8 |
| Metres per Run | 7.55 | 8.02Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.86 | 8.35Better |
| Tackles per Game | 32.2Better | 31.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 94.0Better | 87.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.04Better | 0.07 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.03 |
| Games played | 17 | 16 |