The verdict
Brian To'o has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Brian To'o leads by 43%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonBrian To'o43%of decided measures6measures wonTevita Naufahu
Games played: 22 for Brian To'o, 13 for Tevita Naufahu. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Brian To'o |  Tevita Naufahu |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.68Better | 0.23 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.08Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.09Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 2.7Better | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.05Better | 0.77 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 5.14Better | 3.38 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.32Better | 0.08 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.5Better | 13.0 |
| Passes per Game | 1.8 | 1.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 178.9Better | 108.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 183.3Better | 112.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 67.6Better | 34.0 |
| Runs per Game | 18.7Better | 10.9 |
| Metres per Run | 9.55 | 9.96Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.98 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 5.8Better | 2.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 75.3 | 79.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.27 | 0.19Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.6Better | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 19.7Better | 13.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 22 | 13 |