2026 NRL player comparison

Braydon TrindallvsChanel Harris-Tavita

Sharks · Five-Eighth versus Warriors · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Braydon Trindall has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Braydon Trindall leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

12measures wonBraydon Trindall20%of decided measures8measures wonChanel Harris-Tavita

Games played: 21 for Braydon Trindall, 22 for Chanel Harris-Tavita. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBraydon TrindallWarriors logoChanel Harris-Tavita
Tries per Game0.43Better0.36
Try Assists per Game1.24Better0.64
Line Break Assists per Game1.05Better0.55
Points per Game2.83.5Better
Line Breaks per Game0.29Better0.23
Tackle Breaks per Game0.620.73Better
Offloads per Game0.330.36Better
Possessions per Game50.4Better41.5
Passes per Game32.1Better28.0
Run Metres per Game34.641.0Better
Metres Gained per Game517.8Better347.5
Post-Contact Metres per Game6.59.1Better
Runs per Game4.8Better4.5
Metres per Run7.269.12Better
Metres per Hit-Up––
Tackles per Game13.515.0Better
Tackle Efficiency84.5Better80.2
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.130.13
Conversion Accuracy66.7Better61.5
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.01Better
Kicks per Game14.1Better8.5
Kick Metres per Game483.1Better306.5
Games played2122