2026 NRL player comparison

Braidon BurnsvsJosh Addo-Carr

Cowboys · Wing versus Eels · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Braidon Burns has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Braidon Burns leads by 36%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

15measures wonBraidon Burns36%of decided measures7measures wonJosh Addo-Carr

Games played: 20 for Braidon Burns, 23 for Josh Addo-Carr. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricCowboys logoBraidon BurnsEels logoJosh Addo-Carr
Tries per Game0.75Better0.35
Try Assists per Game0.05Better0.04
Line Break Assists per Game0.20Better0.00
Points per Game3.0Better1.4
Line Breaks per Game0.90Better0.61
Tackle Breaks per Game3.95Better3.65
Offloads per Game1.35Better0.13
Possessions per Game21.6Better16.0
Passes per Game2.12.6Better
Run Metres per Game173.9Better123.3
Metres Gained per Game173.9Better126.6
Post-Contact Metres per Game58.9Better43.8
Runs per Game19.1Better11.9
Metres per Run9.1310.39Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.96Better7.76
Tackles per Game5.7Better5.4
Tackle Efficiency79.2Better78.5
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.200.19Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.060.05Better
Kick Returns per Game2.42.6Better
Kick Return Metres per Game24.727.9Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.40.7Better
Games played2023