2026 NRL player comparison

Billy BurnsvsTeig Wilton

Sharks · Second Row versus Sharks · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Teig Wilton has the edge

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Teig Wilton leads by 56%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

4measures wonBilly Burns56%of decided measures14measures wonTeig Wilton

Games played: 24 for Billy Burns, 21 for Teig Wilton. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBilly BurnsSharks logoTeig Wilton
Tries per Game0.250.38Better
Try Assists per Game0.08Better0.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.040.05Better
Points per Game1.01.5Better
Line Breaks per Game0.330.33
Tackle Breaks per Game1.041.24Better
Offloads per Game0.96Better0.57
Possessions per Game12.312.7Better
Passes per Game3.4Better1.9
Run Metres per Game72.290.7Better
Metres Gained per Game75.891.2Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game27.832.0Better
Runs per Game8.310.8Better
Metres per Run8.71Better8.39
Metres per Hit-Up8.489.00Better
Tackles per Game28.433.9Better
Tackle Efficiency87.390.0Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.100.07Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.050.04Better
Games played2421