The verdict
Liam Martin has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Liam Martin leads by 56%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
4measures wonBilly Burns56%of decided measures14measures wonLiam Martin
Games played: 24 for Billy Burns, 16 for Liam Martin. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Billy Burns |  Liam Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25 | 0.44Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.08 | 0.13Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.04 | 0.25Better |
| Points per Game | 1.0 | 1.8Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.33 | 0.44Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.04 | 1.94Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.96 | 1.06Better |
| Possessions per Game | 12.3 | 13.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.4Better | 2.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 72.2 | 82.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 75.8 | 82.2Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 27.8 | 29.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.3 | 10.4Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.71Better | 7.92 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.48Better | 7.82 |
| Tackles per Game | 28.4 | 29.8Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 87.3 | 87.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.08 |
| Games played | 24 | 16 |