The verdict
Kurt Capewell has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Kurt Capewell leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonBilly Burns5%of decided measures10measures wonKurt Capewell
Games played: 24 for Billy Burns, 13 for Kurt Capewell. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Billy Burns |  Kurt Capewell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25Better | 0.15 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.08 | 0.23Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.04 | 0.15Better |
| Points per Game | 1.0Better | 0.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.33Better | 0.23 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.04Better | 1.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.96Better | 0.62 |
| Possessions per Game | 12.3 | 13.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.4Better | 3.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 72.2 | 76.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 75.8 | 80.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 27.8 | 29.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.3 | 9.2Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.71Better | 8.32 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.48 | 8.67Better |
| Tackles per Game | 28.4 | 29.8Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 87.3Better | 86.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10Better | 0.11 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.04Better |
| Games played | 24 | 13 |