2026 NRL player comparison

Billy BurnsvsHudson Young

Sharks · Second Row versus Raiders · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Hudson Young has the edge

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Hudson Young leads by 78%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

2measures wonBilly Burns78%of decided measures16measures wonHudson Young

Games played: 24 for Billy Burns, 14 for Hudson Young. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBilly BurnsRaiders logoHudson Young
Tries per Game0.250.36Better
Try Assists per Game0.080.43Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.040.21Better
Points per Game1.01.4Better
Line Breaks per Game0.33Better0.29
Tackle Breaks per Game1.042.79Better
Offloads per Game0.961.79Better
Possessions per Game12.322.9Better
Passes per Game3.45.8Better
Run Metres per Game72.2130.0Better
Metres Gained per Game75.8140.9Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game27.845.8Better
Runs per Game8.315.9Better
Metres per Run8.71Better8.20
Metres per Hit-Up8.4810.04Better
Tackles per Game28.430.7Better
Tackle Efficiency87.389.0Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.100.09Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.050.05
Games played2414