2026 NRL player comparison

Billy BurnsvsDylan Egan

Sharks · Second Row versus Dragons · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Too close to call

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

9measures wonBilly Burns0%of decided measures9measures wonDylan Egan

Games played: 24 for Billy Burns, 16 for Dylan Egan. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBilly BurnsDragons logoDylan Egan
Tries per Game0.25Better0.13
Try Assists per Game0.08Better0.06
Line Break Assists per Game0.04Better0.00
Points per Game1.0Better0.5
Line Breaks per Game0.33Better0.13
Tackle Breaks per Game1.042.00Better
Offloads per Game0.96Better0.19
Possessions per Game12.312.3
Passes per Game3.4Better2.3
Run Metres per Game72.281.0Better
Metres Gained per Game75.882.7Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game27.830.1Better
Runs per Game8.39.4Better
Metres per Run8.71Better8.58
Metres per Hit-Up8.48Better8.33
Tackles per Game28.441.3Better
Tackle Efficiency87.392.7Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.100.05Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.050.04Better
Games played2416