The verdict
Jack Bostock has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jack Bostock leads by 62%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
4measures wonBeau Fermor62%of decided measures17measures wonJack Bostock
Games played: 23 for Beau Fermor, 14 for Jack Bostock. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Beau Fermor |  Jack Bostock |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.17 | 0.36Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.04 | 0.79Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.35 | 0.79Better |
| Points per Game | 0.7 | 1.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.30 | 0.36Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.83 | 2.57Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.74 | 1.07Better |
| Possessions per Game | 16.1 | 24.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.4 | 5.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 112.9 | 144.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 114.0 | 148.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 46.0 | 46.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.9 | 17.3Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.14 | 8.36Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.56 | 8.38Better |
| Tackles per Game | 33.8Better | 16.7 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3Better | 84.8 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.08 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 1.0Better |
| Games played | 23 | 14 |