The verdict
Ativalu Lisati has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Ativalu Lisati leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonAtivalu Lisati16%of decided measures8measures wonJack Williams
Games played: 10 for Ativalu Lisati, 24 for Jack Williams. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Ativalu Lisati |  Jack Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.30Better | 0.08 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.13Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.08 |
| Points per Game | 1.2Better | 0.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10 | 0.25Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.20 | 2.25Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.40 | 0.42Better |
| Possessions per Game | 15.1Better | 14.2 |
| Passes per Game | 1.9Better | 1.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 106.0 | 108.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 108.3Better | 108.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 40.6Better | 40.4 |
| Runs per Game | 12.8Better | 12.5 |
| Metres per Run | 8.28 | 8.68Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.76 | 8.84Better |
| Tackles per Game | 39.2 | 39.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3Better | 89.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.08 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 10 | 24 |