2026 NRL player comparison

Ata MariotavsCameron McInnes

Raiders · Lock versus Sharks · Lock

Compare another player

The verdict

Ata Mariota has the edge

Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Ata Mariota leads by 6%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

9measures wonAta Mariota6%of decided measures8measures wonCameron McInnes

Games played: 24 for Ata Mariota, 17 for Cameron McInnes. Compared positions: Lock.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRaiders logoAta MariotaSharks logoCameron McInnes
Tries per Game0.08Better0.06
Try Assists per Game0.000.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.000.18Better
Points per Game0.3Better0.2
Line Breaks per Game0.040.12Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.46Better1.12
Offloads per Game0.58Better0.12
Possessions per Game11.317.9Better
Passes per Game0.88.1Better
Run Metres per Game89.7Better75.9
Metres Gained per Game89.7Better75.9
Post-Contact Metres per Game33.4Better26.2
Runs per Game10.110.1
Metres per Run8.86Better7.55
Metres per Hit-Up8.71Better7.86
Tackles per Game28.432.2Better
Tackle Efficiency91.094.0Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.070.04Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.030.02Better
Games played2417