The verdict
Angus Crichton has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Angus Crichton leads by 29%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonAngus Crichton29%of decided measures6measures wonSalesi Foketi
Games played: 13 for Angus Crichton, 24 for Salesi Foketi. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Angus Crichton | Salesi Foketi |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.15Better | 0.13 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Points per Game | 0.6Better | 0.5 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.08 | 0.13Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.00Better | 1.21 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.08Better | 0.33 |
| Possessions per Game | 13.9Better | 7.3 |
| Passes per Game | 1.4Better | 1.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 106.9Better | 54.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 106.9Better | 54.6 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.4Better | 22.0 |
| Runs per Game | 12.1Better | 6.0 |
| Metres per Run | 8.85 | 9.10Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.68 | 9.09Better |
| Tackles per Game | 30.8Better | 16.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3 | 93.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.03Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 13 | 24 |