The verdict
Will Warbrick has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Will Warbrick leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira20%of decided measures12measures wonWill Warbrick
Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Alofiana Khan-Pereira |  Will Warbrick |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89 | 0.89 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11Better | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 3.6 | 3.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 0.61 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.33 | 3.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.22 | 0.78Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.1 | 19.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.6Better | 1.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 107.7 | 137.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 109.2 | 137.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.4 | 50.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.2 | 14.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.65Better | 9.37 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.05 | 8.65Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.9 | 5.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.0 | 78.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.28 | 0.20Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.09 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.8Better | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.9Better | 18.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5 | 1.6Better |
| Games played | 18 | 18 |