The verdict
Alofiana Khan-Pereira has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Alofiana Khan-Pereira leads by 27%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira27%of decided measures8measures wonTevita Naufahu
Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 13 for Tevita Naufahu. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Alofiana Khan-Pereira |  Tevita Naufahu |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89Better | 0.23 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11Better | 0.08 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 0.77 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.33 | 3.38Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.22Better | 0.08 |
| Possessions per Game | 14.1Better | 13.0 |
| Passes per Game | 2.6Better | 1.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 107.7 | 108.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 109.2 | 112.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.4 | 34.0Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.2Better | 10.9 |
| Metres per Run | 9.65 | 9.96Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.05 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.9Better | 2.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.0 | 79.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.28 | 0.19Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.8Better | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.9Better | 13.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 18 | 13 |