The verdict
Mark Nawaqanitawase has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Mark Nawaqanitawase leads by 36%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira36%of decided measures15measures wonMark Nawaqanitawase
Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 19 for Mark Nawaqanitawase. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Alofiana Khan-Pereira |  Mark Nawaqanitawase |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89Better | 0.79 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11 | 0.32Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17 | 0.32Better |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 3.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 0.74 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.33 | 3.21Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.22 | 1.21Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.1 | 21.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.6Better | 2.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 107.7 | 157.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 109.2 | 162.2Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.4 | 60.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.2 | 16.4Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.65Better | 9.61 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.05 | 7.72Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.9Better | 4.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.0 | 84.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.28 | 0.14Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.11 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.8 | 3.1Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.9 | 34.9Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5 | 1.3Better |
| Games played | 18 | 19 |