The verdict
Alofiana Khan-Pereira has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Alofiana Khan-Pereira leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira18%of decided measures9measures wonLuke Laulili'i
Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 12 for Luke Laulili'i. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Alofiana Khan-Pereira | Luke Laulili'i |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89Better | 0.50 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11 | 0.17Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17Better | 0.08 |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 2.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 0.58 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.33Better | 2.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.22 | 0.42Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.1 | 15.1Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.6Better | 2.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 107.7 | 109.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 109.2 | 110.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.4 | 33.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.2 | 12.1Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.65Better | 9.03 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.05 | 8.26Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.9Better | 2.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.0 | 75.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.28Better | 0.29 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 0.0 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.8Better | 1.4 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.9Better | 14.0 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5Better | 0.4 |
| Games played | 18 | 12 |