The verdict
Lehi Hopoate has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Lehi Hopoate leads by 43%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira43%of decided measures15measures wonLehi Hopoate
Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 23 for Lehi Hopoate. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Alofiana Khan-Pereira |  Lehi Hopoate |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89Better | 0.83 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11 | 0.17Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17 | 0.22Better |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 3.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 1.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.33 | 2.78Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.22 | 0.74Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.1 | 23.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.6 | 4.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 107.7 | 160.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 109.2 | 162.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.4 | 51.5Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.2 | 16.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.65Better | 9.48 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.05 | 7.98Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.9 | 6.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.0Better | 70.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.28Better | 0.29 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.8 | 2.7Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.9 | 27.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5 | 0.9Better |
| Games played | 18 | 23 |