The verdict
Alofiana Khan-Pereira has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Alofiana Khan-Pereira leads by 27%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira27%of decided measures8measures wonGrant Anderson
Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 17 for Grant Anderson. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Alofiana Khan-Pereira |  Grant Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89Better | 0.24 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11 | 0.12Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17 | 0.29Better |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 0.35 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.33Better | 1.06 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.22 | 0.29Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.1Better | 13.7 |
| Passes per Game | 2.6 | 3.4Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 107.7Better | 78.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 109.2Better | 81.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.4Better | 25.3 |
| Runs per Game | 11.2Better | 9.4 |
| Metres per Run | 9.65Better | 8.34 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.05 | 7.44Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.9Better | 4.7 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.0 | 79.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.28 | 0.21Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.07 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.8Better | 1.0 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.9Better | 6.8 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5 | 0.6Better |
| Games played | 18 | 17 |