The verdict
Too close to call
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira0%of decided measures11measures wonEnari Tuala
Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 20 for Enari Tuala. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Alofiana Khan-Pereira |  Enari Tuala |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89Better | 0.25 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11Better | 0.10 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17Better | 0.15 |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 1.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 0.65 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.33 | 2.95Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.22 | 0.40Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.1 | 18.9Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.6Better | 2.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 107.7 | 139.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 109.2 | 144.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.4 | 47.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.2 | 15.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.65Better | 8.80 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.05 | 7.49Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.9 | 13.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.0 | 85.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.28 | 0.13Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.8Better | 1.0 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.9Better | 10.9 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5Better | 0.3 |
| Games played | 18 | 20 |