The verdict
Alofiana Khan-Pereira has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Alofiana Khan-Pereira leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira5%of decided measures10measures wonDean Ieremia
Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 5 for Dean Ieremia. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Alofiana Khan-Pereira |  Dean Ieremia |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89Better | 0.20 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 0.8 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 0.20 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.33Better | 1.20 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.22Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 14.1 | 18.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.6Better | 1.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 107.7 | 131.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 109.2 | 131.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.4 | 43.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.2 | 15.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.65Better | 8.34 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.05 | 7.98Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.9Better | 4.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.0 | 83.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.28 | 0.10Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.8 | 2.2Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.9 | 23.4Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 18 | 5 |