The verdict
Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad leads by 64%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
4measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira64%of decided measures18measures wonCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad
Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 15 for Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Alofiana Khan-Pereira | Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89Better | 0.80 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11 | 0.20Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17 | 0.20Better |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 3.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 0.80 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.33 | 2.67Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.22 | 0.80Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.1 | 21.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.6 | 7.5Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 107.7 | 123.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 109.2 | 125.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.4 | 37.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.2 | 13.3Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.65Better | 9.28 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.05 | 8.24Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.9 | 9.9Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.0 | 82.7Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.28 | 0.15Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.03Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.8 | 2.5Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.9 | 25.7Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5 | 0.6Better |
| Games played | 18 | 15 |