2026 NRL player comparison

Alofiana Khan-PereiravsBraidon Burns

Warriors · Wing versus Cowboys · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Braidon Burns has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Braidon Burns leads by 27%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

8measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira27%of decided measures14measures wonBraidon Burns

Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 20 for Braidon Burns. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoAlofiana Khan-PereiraCowboys logoBraidon Burns
Tries per Game0.89Better0.75
Try Assists per Game0.11Better0.05
Line Break Assists per Game0.170.20Better
Points per Game3.6Better3.0
Line Breaks per Game1.06Better0.90
Tackle Breaks per Game2.333.95Better
Offloads per Game0.221.35Better
Possessions per Game14.121.6Better
Passes per Game2.6Better2.1
Run Metres per Game107.7173.9Better
Metres Gained per Game109.2173.9Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game32.458.9Better
Runs per Game11.219.1Better
Metres per Run9.65Better9.13
Metres per Hit-Up7.058.96Better
Tackles per Game4.95.7Better
Tackle Efficiency71.079.2Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.280.20Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.04Better0.06
Kick Returns per Game1.82.4Better
Kick Return Metres per Game20.924.7Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.5Better0.4
Games played1820