The verdict
Will Penisini has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Will Penisini leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonAJ Brimson16%of decided measures11measures wonWill Penisini
Games played: 22 for AJ Brimson, 12 for Will Penisini. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  AJ Brimson |  Will Penisini |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.27 | 0.33Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.27Better | 0.17 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.23 | 0.42Better |
| Points per Game | 1.1 | 1.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.45Better | 0.33 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.14 | 3.50Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.32 | 1.00Better |
| Possessions per Game | 24.1Better | 17.2 |
| Passes per Game | 14.0Better | 2.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 90.0 | 141.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 115.0 | 141.3Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.0 | 54.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.2 | 14.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.39 | 9.34Better |
| Tackles per Game | 15.8Better | 12.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.9Better | 80.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Games played | 22 | 12 |