The verdict
AJ Brimson has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, AJ Brimson leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonAJ Brimson5%of decided measures10measures wonLeka Halasima
Games played: 22 for AJ Brimson, 20 for Leka Halasima. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  AJ Brimson |  Leka Halasima |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.27 | 0.40Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.27Better | 0.10 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.23Better | 0.15 |
| Points per Game | 1.1 | 1.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.45Better | 0.35 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.14 | 3.60Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.32Better | 0.20 |
| Possessions per Game | 24.1Better | 11.9 |
| Passes per Game | 14.0Better | 1.3 |
| Run Metres per Game | 90.0 | 90.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 115.0Better | 90.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.0 | 37.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.2 | 9.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.75Better | 9.31 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.39 | 8.82Better |
| Tackles per Game | 15.8 | 18.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.9Better | 83.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.08 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 22 | 20 |