The verdict
Will Warbrick has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Will Warbrick leads by 36%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonWill Warbrick36%of decided measures7measures wonZac Laybutt
Games played: 18 for Will Warbrick, 21 for Zac Laybutt. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Will Warbrick |  Zac Laybutt |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.06 | 0.10Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.29Better |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.61Better | 0.24 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.00Better | 1.05 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.78Better | 0.19 |
| Possessions per Game | 19.7Better | 14.6 |
| Passes per Game | 1.6 | 4.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 137.9Better | 84.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 137.9Better | 87.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 50.4Better | 26.1 |
| Runs per Game | 14.7Better | 10.0 |
| Metres per Run | 9.37Better | 8.44 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.65Better | 8.22 |
| Tackles per Game | 5.4 | 9.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.9 | 81.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.20 | 0.17Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.09 | 0.07Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.5Better | 0.7 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 18.3Better | 6.5 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.6Better | 0.3 |
| Games played | 18 | 21 |